September 11th Attacks
The true culprits behind the 9/11 attacks
In this article which is sure to be my largest yet I'll explain how and why the 9/11 attacks were a joint CIA/MOSSAD operation with the entire goal of acclerating an all out war in the Middle East for both the politicial and economic benefit of America and Israel, in the process marking the beginning of what is referred to by many as Gladio B.
|George Washington Bridge Plot|
|Zionist Agents in America|
|Gomel Chesed Cemetery Incident|
|Urban Moving Systems|
|9/11 Mural Van|
|Israeli Art Student Scam|
For many years the 9/11 attacks have been put under a lense and analyzed from every angle because a plethora of 'facts' surrounding the incident just don't add up when thought about beyond a surface level. One of the first things to mention in regards to 9/11 are the numerous terror drills being carried out during the attacks, which leave a lot to be explained, but let's look into them.
Numerous terror drills were being carried out on the day of the 9/11 attacks, including Timely Alert II which was a 'disaster drill' being carried out at Fort Monmouth the same day as the attacks on the Twin Towers, a quote from an article describing the drill reads as follows:
"The world will never be the same again. The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon Sept. 11 have changed everything; from our sense of security to how we get to work.
'There was a plan in place, but we went from 0 to 60 overnight, so to speak,' said Lt. Col. Stephen N. Wood, Garrison commander, here. 'By sheer coincidence we were scheduled to conduct Timely Alert II, a force protection exercise on Sept. 11 and because of that, some of the concrete barriers were already in place.'
Wood said people on post told him when they first saw live footage of the events unfolding at the World Trade Center, they thought it was some elaborate training video to accompany the exercise."
Additionally NORAD was conducting two terror drills on the same day called Global Guardian and Vigilant Guardian which simulated airlines being hijacked in a plethora of scenarios, one account of the drill is given by Lieutenant Colonel Kevin Nasypany and it reads as follows:
"When they told me there was a hijack, my first reaction was, Somebody started the exercise early," Nasypany later told me. "The day's exercise was designed to run a range of scenarios, including a 'traditional' simulated hijack in which politically motivated perpetrators commandeer an aircraft, land on a Cuba-like island, and seek asylum. I actually said out loud, 'The hijack's not supposed to be for another hour,' Nasypany recalled."
Next to note is that the National Reconnaissance Office was running a drill the same day as the attacks which involved a corporate jet crashing into one of the four towers of the NRO Headquarters in Chantilly, a summary of the drill reads as follows:
"The exercise is set to commence at 9:00 a.m., when its observers meet to be briefed. The observers and exercise role players are to move to their positions for the exercise 10 to 15 minutes later. The plane in the exercise scenario is a Learjet 35A with two pilots and four passengers on board, which takes off at 9:30 a.m. from Dulles Airport. This is the airport Flight 77, which crashes into the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m., took off from earlier in the morning (see (8:20 a.m.) September 11, 2001). A minute after taking off, the Learjet is supposed to experience a mechanical failure. It then goes out of control, leading it to crash into one of the four towers at the NRO’s headquarters at around 9:32 a.m. (see 9:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m. September 11, 2001). No real plane is going to be used in the exercise, but some stairwells and exits at the NRO headquarters are to be closed off in order to simulate the damage from the crash, forcing employees to find other ways to evacuate the building."
And finally FEMA scheduled Operation TRIPOD for September 12th, 2001 which was a bioterrorism exercise but it's still important to note because of the later Amerithax incident and the fact that it was being planned on September 11th itself, a description of the operation is below:
"September 11 was going to be a busy day at the OEM. Staff members arrived early to prepare for Operation Tripod, an exercise that would test the plan to distribute antibiotics to the entire city population during a bioterrorism attack. The exercise was planned for September 12, with police and fire department cadets to be used as the simulated civilian population. Pier 92 was set up as a model distribution station where the "victims" of the mock attack who needed to receive antibiotics would be treated."
We're supposed to believe that the large amount of drills being carried out and planned on the day of the attacks are merely coincidental in nature and not related, even though one of them involved terrorists hijacking planes and using them to crash into buildings? I don't think so, many people believe that not only was the WTC 7 building demolished with explosives but WTC 1 and WTC 2 were also taken down via demolition aswell, let's take a look at the evidence for this.
On the day of the attacks both of the Twin Towers suddenly turned to dust from the top to the bottom, not leaving any trace amounts of large wreckage as the explosion had seemingly pulverized the entire building into nothing but concrete dust and small section of steel framing, another odd detail is the fact that ground teams had problems with clearing away debris as the soles of their soles were melting, combine this with the fact that persistent heat of 400ºF to more than 2,800ºF and the search and rescue teams finding molten steel in the wreckage it's quite obvious that more was used to take down the Twin Towers besides two planes and jet fuel.
This has been noted by many organizations but the one I'll mention is Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth who compiled a list of evidence that the Twin Towers were subjected to controlled demolition, a shortened version will be provided below for ease of access:
- A collapse due to fire would likely proceed gradually with large deformations visible in the building’s perimeter.
- The smooth rate of descent was measured at 2/3 of free-fall. In other words, the building was accelerating (traveling faster and faster second by second) straight down through what should have been the path of greatest resistance
- More than a hundred first responders reported experiencing explosions and/or flashes of light as the destruction commenced. Much of this evidence was also captured on video by multiple cameras.
- Improbable symmetry of debris distribution.
- Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
A few videos explaining the signs of controlled demolition will be linked below for your viewing purposes, please watch these as they're very informative and give a better idea of what actually happened that day.
North Tower Exploding
But we still aren't done yet as the Open Chemical Physics Journal issued a report in 2009 titled 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe' detailing how nano-thermite was found in the rubble of the Twin Towers, an excerpt from the report reads as follows:
"We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approxi- mately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms oc- curring at approximately 430 ̊C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic."
Thermite chips found in the rubble of the Twin Towers
And more with the idea that the Twin Towers were brought down via controlled demolition/thermite, hotspots around the Twin Towers stayed at a temperature of 800.33°F / 426.85°C to 1376.33°F / 746.85°C as long as five days after the Twin Towers were taken down, as evidenced by the USGS and their thermal imaging of the area in the days following the attacks - but they assure you that this is completely and totally normal (it isn't).
Hot spots show as orange and yellow areas. Dozens of hot spots are seen on September 16
For further information on the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers I highly advise reading the following reports:
Demolition Access To The WTC Towers - Kevin Ryan
The Physics of High Rise Building Collapses - European Physics News
Footage of the WTC 7 building collapsing
One of the most infamous cases regarding 9/11 has to be the collapse of the WTC 7 building, the falling of the building heavily resembling a controlled demolition and with hundreds of people disagreeing with the idea that the building fell due to a fire inside of the building caused by wooden chairs and desks it's a case to behold. The first thing to note is that the WTC 7 building is the only steel reinforced skyscraper that has collapsed due to an interior fire in known history; the Windsor Tower in Madrid, the Mandarin Oriental Hotel, the First Interstate Bank, the Grenfell Tower and the Jianye Building - all steel framed and reinforced skyscrapers which experienced massive fires yet didn't collapse, combined with the fact that the 9/11 Commission never mentioned the collapse of the WTC 7 building at all it makes the incident a third rail topic and a very obscured one at that (but we all know that the 9/11 Commission was a sham anyway; the pentagon lying to the panel, NORAD intentionally lying to the panel, and the CIA withholding essential information from the panel on the hijackers... But I digress).
In a similar vein to the Twin Towers, nano-thermite was found in the rubble of the WTC 7 building (as was noted in 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe') to further back this up I'll show you the story of survivors Barry Jennings and Michael Hess who reported an explosion on the 8th floor of the WTC 7 building that knocked them back, going against official stories regarding the collapse of the WTC 7 building, Barry Jenning was later killed and his entire family went missing.
Barry Jennings on the WTC 7 collapse
Combine this with more details including that the WTC 7 building collapsed at the same rate as the average controlled demolition (6.5 seconds) and that the building entered freefall which is especially strange as it would've required for all structural support for the building to have been suddenly and abruptly removed, it's clear that WTC 7 didn't fall because of an interior fire caused by office supplies and wooden furniture as the official story so vehemently claims but was obviously taken down via nano-thermite or explosives of some sort.
To top all of this off, the NIST's official model showing the collapse of the WTC 7 building, making it a spectular occassion as it's the first and only time a large building has completely fallen due to an interior fire, rather conveniently though the NIST has refused to release any and all information that they used to create the model of the WTC collapse by reasoning it would 'jeopardize public safety' - which is an incredibly obvious copout that I don't even need to elaborate any further on because the excuse used is quite honestly pathetic. To end this section of the article I'll leave you with a video from the talented men and women at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
WTC 7 In Freefall No Longer Controversial
The supposed impact of American Airlines Flight 77 at the Pentagon
This is a rather simple point to explain, simply put it's rather ludicrous to believe that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon and left this small of a crater in the side of the building (only 16 ft), a Boeing 757 has an exterior height of 44ft 6in, a wingspan of 124ft 10in and a overall length of 155ft 3in - all of which are larger in length and width than the impact zone seen in the above picture, but that's not even mentioning the supposed exit point of the Boeing itself which is even more laughable, you'll see why in a minute.
The point of exit for the Boeing 757 after it crashed into the Pentagon
The fact that they tried to pass this off as legitmate is incredibly laughable and it makes me wonder if they truly believe we're stupid, combine the fact that there's no plane wreckage in any of the photos of the entry or exit, any aerial photos of the aftermath or the sort it's clear to see that a Boeing 757 absolutely did not crash into the Pentagon.
But let's take a look at the official narrative, which is that Hani Hanjour made a 270° corkscrew diving turn into the Pentagon, in the process knocking down 5 lightposts - this is the same man that was given flight lessons by Rick Garza, who noted that he was a terrible pilot who couldn't even handle a single engine Cessna 172 and was in general terribly incompetent. So it begs the question as to how such a terrible pilot could pull off such a high risk maneuver that would be hard for even the most talented pilots to accomplish with seemingly no problems at all.
And, not surprisingly there were hundreds of videos that supposedly caught the plane impact with the Pentagon yet only one of the hundreds of videos has been released and the video itself is too blurry to show if it was a missile as a lot of truthers claim or if it was really a Boeing 757... I should probably mention that all of the footage aside from one incredibly grainy video that is less a video and more a slideshow of the attack were seized by the FBI on the grounds of 'protecting national security' - but let's take a look at the only footage we have of the Pentagon attack.
Pentagon Security Footage
The 'plane' is first seen at exactly 1:26 in the video, the next immediate frame after that is the explosion - let's get a closer look at the 'plane' and see if we can make out for sure if it's really a plane or not.
A zoomed in still frame of the 'plane' approaching the Pentagon
The footage is (obviously) too blurry to make out what it is, but from what can be seen it most certainly doesn't resemble a plane in the slightest, let alone one from American Airlines which would be sporting the typical colors that all of their planes do. But nothing is noticeably visible on the supposed 'plane' except for it being white.
Although many have argued that the hundreds of eyewitnesses who reported seeing a plane are proof that it happened, the impact certainly does raise questions and a lot of them to say the least; was a plane actually flown into the Pentagon or was it a cruise missile? The claims both have evidence for them but the inconsistencies in the impact/exit make it look more like a missile hit the Pentagon than anything else. But whether or not you believe it's a plane or a missile it's obvious that Hani Hanjour and his subpar flight skills couldn't have pulled this off at all.
The impact zone of Flight 93
The above image is indeed supposed to be the impact zone of Flight 93, a 100 ton airplane with a length of 155ft 3in and a height of 44ft 6in. The official explanation is that the plane broke up and then the wreckage burrowed itself magically underground upon making contact with it. Theories range from the incident being a staged psyop in order to inspire American patriotism by telling the story of 'brave civilians who fought against the hijackers' or that the plane was shot down by fighter interceptors after the cockpit was stormed by the passengers and they attempted to land the plane and exit. However it's rather clear that the crater left behind by what's supposedly a Boeing 757 doesn't quite add up, combined with the fact that Dick Cheney admitted in full that Fighter Jets were sent out to intercept and shoot down Flight 93 it looks more and more like Flight 93 was shot down due to passenger mutiny - however it's said that the call was taken back at the last moment... Sure.
One thing however to note is that there were very little plane or body parts found at the crash scene in Shanksville, which was noted as usual by many including the local coroner Wallace Miller who said the following:
"It was a really a very unusual site. You almost would’ve thought the passengers had been dropped off somewhere... Even by the standard model of an airplane crash, there was very little, even by those standards."
"The interesting thing about this particular case is that I haven’t, to this day, 11 months later, seen any single drop of blood. Not a drop. The only thing I can deduce is that the crash was over in half a second. There was a fireball 15-20 metres high, so all of that material just got vaporised."
So if Flight 93 was truly shot down it was most likely shot down by a board gun and not a missile as it would have left far more debris and human remains stewn about the site of impact, however it seems incredibly likely that Flight 93 was shot down and covered up with the story that it burrowed itself underground and the real area of impact was most likely just a part of the plane that left a crater in the ground.
However the last bit of information I'll leave you with are documents that were released by the hacker group 'The Dark Overlord' which showed that many lawyers in the litigation process considered it a fact that Flight 93 was indeed shot down - but are the documents real? That is for time to tell, a video detailing the leaks will be linked below:
The Dark Overlord Docs: The Military Intervened With United 93
The same day as the 9/11 attacks it was reported that NYPD officers arrested men on the George Washington Bridge with a van full of explosives, the claim was later retracted and no further comment on the incident was ever given beyond that, however video recordings of the news reports from the incident still exist.
Truckload Of Explosives Found Under George Washington Bridge On 9/11
Some have said that the plot might have been foiled and as a result was covered up, alleging that the men in the van were either CIA or MOSSAD agents tasked with blowing up the George Washington bridge but were caught in the process. Whatever the case it's vastly important to remember this incident as it's nearly become lost to time.
A week after 9/11 the US Government created CIA hitsquads based on the MOSSAD hitsquads organized after the 1972 Munich massacre, this was explained away as simply being to hunt down and kill the terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks but with the large amount of suspicious deaths that happened shortly after 9/11 it's highly important to remember that this happened. A lot of these men will be posted below for research purposes (the death of Barry Jennings will not be listed here since he was already listed above):
David Graham was a dentist who met two of the hijackers ten months before 9/11. He reported his evidence to the FBI, who were actively uninterested. He died in 2006 after creating The Graham Report which went against the official 9/11 narrative
Kenneth Johannemann was a janitor at the World Trade Centre who reported seeing and hearing massive explosions in the basement of the North Tower, he was later found dead of an apparent suicide in 2008
Danny Jowenko was an expert in controlled demolition who testified that the collapse of the WTC 7 building was an act of controlled demolition, he was killed in a car crash in 2011
And many, many more... For a list of more suspicious and conveniently timed deaths that took place after 9/11 I highly suggest looking into the premature deaths page on Wikispooks, but now we go into the next section of the article which is about the Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks.
Return to Possible False Flags